Async interruption response misattribution

open

1 independent reportacross 1 sourceon 1 stacklast reported 2026-07-26

What this is

A delayed decision about whether an earlier overlap counted as an interruption gets wrongly applied to a later, unrelated moment, cutting the agent off for speech that was never actually judged an interruption.

Status open: reported and still open where it was reported.

Evidence

toubatbrian2026-07-26livekitGitHub issuesgithub.com/…/2119
...is accepted and attributed to that later overlap — which can emit a false isInterruption: true and cut off the agent for a user utterance the model never scored that...

First seen 2026-07-26 · our copy fetched 2026-07-26T03:05:24Z · SHA-256 of that copy begins a5091d4d64d4c61e… · profile

Quotes run to 30 words around the reported failure and link to the post.Add your call to this entryTake a quote down within 24 hours.

What is measurable

Signalhotato autopsy ./call.wav maps to this mode as detector kind overlap_while_agent_talking. Printed as BARGE-IN: the caller took the floor and the agent kept speaking, reported with the overlap in seconds. Needs the caller and agent on separate channels.
EstablishesThe seconds of overlap where the caller had taken the floor and the agent kept speaking, with the timestamp in the call where it started.
What else it establishes, and what your own trace settles
  • The same recording produces the same overlap on every run, so the number is comparable across builds.

What your trace settles

  • Your pipeline trace at that timestamp names what held the floor: the interrupt handler, the VAD threshold, or the realtime API's own turn logic.
  • Whether the caller meant to interrupt is a judgement about the conversation; the measurement covers who held the floor and for how long.
TierTier 1 · dual-channel audio: caller and agent separated at capture, so overlap and timing are facts of the recording, exact to the sample. hotato is MIT and runs locally, getting started.

Status history

The record has carried one status since it opened: open, reported and still open where it was reported. A move lands here with the link, the quote and the date that show it.

Discussion

Reader discussion of this mode: what fixed it and what did not. The reports above are attributed and linked; a comment is a comment.

Open this discussion on GitHub

The record

Ids, digests, every link this entry stands on, and how to take a quote down
Atlas idVFA-2026-0016
Mode idpat_e056fac7e6cf3eb1621eff88
Content digestsha256:e056fac7e6cf3eb1621eff88027176e4a8f38be862961b8bf306717887b52646
First reported2026-07-26
Last reported2026-07-26
First seen by the atlas2026-07-26T02:09:49Z
Last re-checked2026-07-26T02:09:49Z
Reported onlivekit
SourcesGitHub issues
Scope1 independent public report across 1 source. This entry states where the mode has been reported; where else it can occur is what the next report settles.
References
  1. reporthttps://github.com/livekit/agents-js/issues/2119 · toubatbrian · GitHub issues · 2026-07-26
Machine surfacesfeed.jsonfeed.atomfeed.schema.jsonatlas.llms.txt
RemovalIf you wrote something quoted on this page and want it gone, one email to [email protected] does it. The removal path takes the quote, the handle and the link off this page, out of the feeds and out of the llms.txt within 24 hours, and tombstones the id so the entry cannot quietly return at a new address.